Fair versus unFair : How Do CHinese Citizens view Current inequalities ?
نویسنده
چکیده
Since the country’s post-1978 reforms, China has experienced sweeping changes in the principles of remuneration and distribution of benefits and opportunities. These changes have brought about corresponding— and generally increased—inequalities among the citizenry. The fact of these inequalities is not in dispute. But how do ordinary Chinese citizens view them? What do they think of the country’s current structures of inequality and mobility opportunities? Do they accept them, or do they feel they are unfair? To what extent does China’s population resent and resist these changes or even harbor nostalgia for the now officially rejected and discarded distributional principles of the planned socialism era (roughly from 1955 to 1978)? Many recent analyses of Chinese society, by both Chinese and foreign observers, claim that the increased inequality generated by China’s reforms has inspired anger among ordinary Chinese. Indeed, popular anger is often portrayed as a major force behind the wave of protest incidents that has buffeted China in recent years.1 This kind of analysis places China on the edge of what I would describe as a “social volcano” from which political instability and system breakdown might erupt at any moment. For example, the Central Party School polled senior officials in 2004 and concluded that the income gap was China’s most serious social problem, far ahead of crime and corruption, which were ranked two and three, respectively.2 Similarly, a summary of the 2006 “Blue Book” (an annual assessment of the state of Chinese society published by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences) stated, “The Gini coefficient, an indicator of income disparities, reached 0.53 last year, far higher than a dangerous level of 0.4.”3 But are these alarmist messages correct? Is there evidence of popular anger in China about inequality and distributive justice issues? This chapter seeks to provide answers to these questions. To present a general descriptive overview of contemporary popular attitudes on these issues, I rely on responses to the 2004 National China Inequality and Distributive Justice Survey.4 In examining the patterns of response to a wide range of questions used in our survey—questions dealing with both competing principles of distribution and perceptions of actual current patterns of inequality and social mobility—I seek to determine which inequality principles and patterns are seen as fair and which are seen as unfair. Fair versus unFair: How Do CHinese Citizens view Current inequalities?
منابع مشابه
Just Luck: An Experimental Study of Risk Taking and Fairness
What is the fair distribution of gains and losses from risk taking? The answer to this question has wide-ranging implications for economic policy. This paper studies people’s fairness preferences in risky situations. It reports the results from a two stage dictator game where the distribution phase was preceded by a risk-taking phase in which individuals made decisions about whether to take ris...
متن کاملUnfair inequalities in health and health care.
Inequalities in health and health care are caused by different factors. Measuring "unfair" inequalities implies that a distinction is introduced between causal variables leading to ethically legitimate inequalities and causal variables leading to ethically illegitimate inequalities. An example of the former could be life-style choices, an example of the latter is social background. We show how ...
متن کامل“I pick you”: the impact of fairness and race on infants’ selection of social partners
By 15 months of age infants are sensitive to violations of fairness norms as assessed via their enhanced visual attention to unfair versus fair outcomes in violation-of-expectation paradigms. The current study investigated whether 15-month-old infants select social partners on the basis of prior fair versus unfair behavior, and whether infants integrate social selections on the basis of fairnes...
متن کاملA Global Social Support System: What the International Community Could Learn From the United States’ National Basketball Association’s Scheme for Redistribution of New Talent
If global trade were fair, it is argued, then international aid would be unnecessary and inequalities inherent to the economic system would be justifiable. Here, we argue that while global trade is unfair, in part because richer countries set the rules, we believe that additional interventions must go beyond trade regulation and short-term aid to redress inequalities among countries that will p...
متن کاملChina’s Post-Socialist Inequality
Since the death of Mao Zedong in 1976 and the launch of market reforms under Deng Xiaoping’s leadership in 1978, China has undergone dramatic changes that have affected the lives of Chinese citizens in multiple ways. With the step-by-step dismantling of China’s system of centrally planned socialism and other reforms, growth rates have accelerated, producing rising living standards, reduced pove...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010